Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Julian Lenz vs Pedro Sakamoto Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lenz vs Sakamoto analysis and find out who is favored!
Julian Lenz vs Pedro Sakamoto Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lenz 1 - 0 Sakamoto
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lenz has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Sakamoto has won 48.58%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lenz, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sakamoto has won 51.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.79% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lenz has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sakamoto has saved 55.9% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lenz has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Sakamoto winning 58.57% (W/L 41/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lenz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 121/ 95), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Sakamoto has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 373/ 273), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 31/ 34).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lenz winning 1 times and Sakamoto being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lenz winning 2 and Sakamoto winning 0. The last match between Lenz and Sakamoto was at the Germany F8 (Kassel), 17-07-2018, First, Clay with Julian Lenz getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:36:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lenz and Sakamoto have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lenz winning 0 times and Sakamoto 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lenz winning 0, and Sakamoto 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lenz has played against opponents with an average rank of while Sakamoto has played against players with an average rank of 305.43.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lenz has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sakamoto has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lenz has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sakamoto has converted 47.94% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
864
Rank
227
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
302
Rank
284
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
55% (207-169)
Career Total W/L
57% (406-309)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
52% (16-15)
$25,665
Career Prize Money
$20,740
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Julian Lenz vs Pedro Sakamoto For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Lenz VS Sakamoto
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Julian Lenz | Pedro Sakamoto |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| DFs Total | 6 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:0 | 1:36:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 49% (27/55) | 54% (29/54) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (21/27) | 41% (12/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (13/28) | 40% (10/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 50% (3/6) |
| Return Points W% | 59% (32/54) | 38% (21/55) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-1 |
Stats 
Julian Lenz
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
4
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Julian Lenz | Pedro Sakamoto |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 52% (16/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (36/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (323/298) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (15/14) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 74 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 50 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:37:18 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 244.26 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (1191/1928) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 65% (780/1191) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (358/737) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 48% (93/194) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (783/1880) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (11/14) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 83% (5/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 53% (16/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 94% (16/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 6% (16/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 7% (15/1) |
Julian Lenz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Robin Haase
Player
Julian Lenz
61%
(
71 of
117)
1st Serve %
71%
(
79 of
111)
11
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
58 of
79)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
41 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
111)
114
Total Points Won
114
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
67%
(
68 of
101)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
107)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
49 of
69)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
32 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
6-2 6-7(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Dennis Novak
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
101)
11
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
49 of
66)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
33 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
101)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Hazem Naow
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Mikalai Haliak
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Julian Lenz
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
19
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
13 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
17 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Aldin Setkic
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
14
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
6
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Andrew Paulson
58%
(
69 of
120)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
12
Aces
13
7
Double Faults
5
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
48 of
62)
59%
(
30 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
30%
(
36 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
30 of
100)
114
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(6) 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Julian Lenz
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
110)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
8
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
28%
(
10 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Julian Lenz
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
15 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Pedro Sakamoto Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Hernan Casanova
72%
(
80 of
111)
1st Serve %
84%
(
103 of
123)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
64 of
103)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
123)
122
Total Points Won
112
|
6-3 6-7(3) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Valerio Aboian
74%
(
95 of
129)
1st Serve %
65%
(
79 of
121)
5
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
55 of
79)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
44 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
42 of
121)
127
Total Points Won
123
|
7-6(5) 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Milledge Cossu
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
80%
(
33 of
41)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lautaro Midon
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
60%
(
56 of
93)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
98)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gonzalo Villanueva
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
83)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
38 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Luis Queiroz Miguel
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guido Ivan Justo
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve %
50%
(
43 of
86)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bruno Fernandez
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
40%
(
4 of
10)
1st Serve %
56%
(
10 of
18)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
50%
(
2 of
4)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
16
Total Points Won
12
|
3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Lenz Vs Sakamoto Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Lenz are available here and Sakamoto photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
